Reiding…

Over at FullBright blog, (which I wish I read more of) is a concept called “Peace” I really want to see work as a game. Not as a game that you win or lose but a game where you explore your views on the subject of violence. I was going to post a reply in the comments section but it got way to long. I recommend you read Christiaan’s proposal for “Peace” and then read below.

I love the concept and suggest checking out the movie, Rendition. It has a cyclical storytelling approach, where what you see in the beginning is what you see at the end, but from a different perspective. Everything else in the middle is learning a little bit why what you see at the beginning and end occurs.

I feel Peace needs more focus. Focus on the suicide bombing event itself and nothing else. You also need to say something with the interactions players can do. If I were making this game, I would say that violence begets violence, that we must take responsibility for our actions to stop the cycle of violence. Everything in the game must serve this.

I think the sequence of scenes is important. Here are my suggestions:

1. Mother with child caught in suicide bombing. In the café with the daughter, you pick up a newspaper, headlines read, “Increased security amid rumors of suicide bombing.” Daughter asks you, “What’s in the news mama?” Do you tell her that we live in a messed up world and must eliminate our enemies before they do the same to us? Do you smile and give her a kiss on the cheek? Do you try to explain to her the reality of the situation and that violence isn’t the answer?

Mood and pacing: Calm, foreboding, peaceful until the blast.

2. Soldier deals with the chaos afterwards, who’s a threat? Who do I protect? You are given orders to detain anyone you think is a possible suspect and to use any amount of force you deem necessary.

Mood and pacing: Frantic, violent, angry, hopelessness.

3. As someone else, you tell a young boy, 7 his mother died in the suicide bombing. How do you do this? Gently? Not at all? See his emotional reaction, cries, punches you in the legs.

Mood and pacing: Slow, sorrowful.

4. As a paramedic you grab someone injured, put him/her in the ambulance and then discover his/her chest is strapped with bombs. What do you do? Bomb’s disabled, your partner wants to kill the patient, do you stand by and let him/her do that? Do you try to save the patient? Do you join in?

Mood and pacing: Frantic, fearful, angry.

5. You are the suicide bomber. What might make it interesting, is that sometimes they force the bombers to press the activate button and then upon release it explodes. What if players are tricked into doing this and then, “Oh by the way, don’t release Right Trigger until we say so.” What do you, the player, the suicide bomber do then? No matter what, you are a dead man/woman. Do you try to run to an isolated area to not hurt anyone else or say, fuck it, if I’m going, then I’m bringing someone with me. Also, I think it would be very interesting if you see the other suicide bomber that you saw while as a paramedic in the same place as you. It will be interesting to be confronted with the possibilities of your actions and really hit home the idea of violence creates more violence.

Mood and pacing: Slow, fearful, sorrowful, or hopeful.

There was a lot of interest at the 2008 Game Developers Conference regarding creating videogames for social good, explore human themes or that at least are embedded with something important to say. I’m really happy to see this because it’s a goal of mine to create games around social issues that inspire people to take action.

Related to that, Philip Zimbardo (social psychologist of the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment) is interviewed on Wired.com about his work and his theories as to why good people can become evil and treat others inhumanely. He says during the interview, “But once I switched to being the prison superintendent, I was a different person. It’s hard to believe that, but I was transformed.”

Here’s something to think about. I do believe videogames can be used to transform people, help them to be more open to different ideas and possibilities, to be more tolerant, and accepting of others. That’s all fine and dandy, but if I believe that to be true for the positive side of videogames, shouldn’t I be able to admit that videogames can do the same for the negative side? If videogames can make people more tolerant of others, can’t they also have the power to make people less tolerant?

It’s a scary thought, because, as creators of the most immersive and potentially most influential medium yet, we have a great responsibility not to screw things up for everyone else.